However, Honey, I do think your line of thought provides some good underlying food for thought for divorce laws to be updated.

It is one thing if kids who need support are involved or if somebody( male or female ) had become incapable of supporting themselves as a result of the marriage. For example, somebody who took time off from their career to raise the children, but who now can’t get a decent job because they have been out of things for too long.

However, when a person is awarded alimony/palimony and kids/support issues aren’t involved a case can be made that person essentially became a prostitute.

It essentially says that because that person had sex with the party they are entitled to be compensated.
beforewisdom´s last blog …” – but people have drank milk for centuries”

So the distinction is pretty huge.
Honey´s last blog …Lance’s 2010 Focus: Don’t Be A Douche

Who cares? For girls that label other girls being “prostitute” doesn’t release you from being a “whore”. Every girl is a whore. One is for money; other is for happiness; third may be just someone to pay her and her kids bills.

No offense ladies, you are smarter, better built sexy transcending gift to us. But you are all magnificent whores. So are the housewives, stay home moms, teenager girls, old girls…

All girls will agree with me; being a whore for that special guy that makes you pick your brains from the floor is absolute truth. Imagine stay home moms being whores for those guys that pay the rent. Who is more “just” a whore? Does it even matter.
———————————-

Obviously husbands who see actual whores have not only violated their relationships with their wives, but also their own (and their partners’) health. I don’t think I condoned that anywhere.

People who are in love and who make life decisions based on that love and their own compatibility obviously don’t fall into the category of whore, either. My point is that there are plenty of women who decide to marry a man who wants children, regardless of whether they want children themselves, in order to not have to have a regular job. I don’t think that’s fair to the husband or the children – in fact I think it’s pretty dispiccable.

So if you are disagreeing with me, then I guess you are arguing that it’s okay for women to have children they don’t love with men they are using for money?

Not for me, thanks! I work a regular 8-to-5 job and pay not only for my half of the bills, but also pay off my own debts. Since we are not going to have kids, all of our decisions will be made only with each others’ best interests in mind. A good life, if you ask me!

Honey´s last blog post…Can He Come Too Soon?

But a prostitute has no expectation of return business, isn’t there to enjoy herself/himself, isn’t committed to legal or ethical responsibility. A prostitute isn’t interested in the welfare of a temporary partner, beyond maintaining a business relationship.

A stay at home Mom is a mate, first and foremost. Loyal, depended on beyond sexual services. Her character and values are critical to the success of the family. And even your label – Mom, and At Home – bely the potrayal of her as primarily a sex provider.

I vote, “No!”

Brad K.´s last blog post…Are stay-at-home moms prostitutes?

As far as the housewife, that’s way over the top for me. She has sex with him because it is the ultimate expression of her love. Children are, or at least should be, the ultimate gift to each other, formed and created together from that love. They then carry on that love after you are gone, and pass it on to the next generation. At least in a perfect World.

searchingwithin´s last blog post…TGIF – The Five Best Love and Relationships Articles From Around the Web – #1

Lance´s last blog post…Busy, Good Things

Janak´s last blog post…How to Find Sex: the Art of the One Night Stand – Part 15 “Having Sex”